Khalistan Calling Nov. 10, 2004

Musings on the Indian DemoNcracy

=====

"No democracy can long survive

which does not accept as fundamental to its very existence

the recognition of the Rights of minorities."

--- President Franklin Roosevelt

=====

"India is a geographical term.

It is no more a united nation than the Equator"

--- Sir Winston Churchill

By

Dr. Amarjit Singh

Address:

Khalistan Affairs Center

956-National Press Building, Washington D.C. 20045 USA

Tel: 202-637-9210 :: Fax: 202-637-9211

INTERNET SITE INFORMATION:-

Web Site: http://www.khalistan-affairs.org

E-mail: kacwashdc@yahoo.com

Washington DC: November 10, 2004: The Indian propaganda machinery, and numerous Indian jingoists, keep on repeating, by rote, that India (the 'Sick man of the world GDP derby' see our column at: > http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/Main/K_Calling/kc08182004.htm <) is the world's largest 'democracy'. By constantly repeating that 'India is a democracy', 'India is the world's largest democracy,' does not make India a democracy, as there is much more to it than that. "Democracy is a charming form of government, full of variety and disorder, and dispensing a sort of equality to equals and unequals alike," wrote Plato (428-347B.C.) the Greek philosopher and prose writer in his masterpiece THE REPUBLIC.

Recently the former Indian foreign minister, in the BJP Vajpayee government, Yashwant Sinha, wrote a rejoinder to an editorial in the Hindustan Times newspaper, which had condemned him (Sinha) for searching the text of the ancient Hindu epic Mahaabharata to bestow the derogatory title of 'Shikandi' on poster-boy Indian Prime minister Dr. Manmohan Singh, a Sikh. We will explain the implication of the use of the 'Shikandi' word and what it means later. In his rejoinder Op-ED Mr. Yashwant Sinha asked some relevant questions, which question India's parliamentary democracy credentials. A 'democracy' which is supposed to be a clone of the British parliamentary democracy's customs, procedures and traditions something about which most 'educated' Indians take false pride.

Yashwant Sinha in his Hindustan Times Op-ed, headlined, "So sorry we're the opposition," asked a few pertinant questions, which ridicule the democratic credentials of India. Wrote he:- "Does it matter at all that Dr. Manmohan Singh (who has been nominated as Prime minister by Mrs. Sonia Gandhi) is not the leader of his party - the Congress party? Does it matter that Manmohan Singh is not even the leader of the Congress parliamentary party? Does it matter if Dr. Manmohan Singh was not elected but selected by the President of his party (Mrs. Sonia Gandhi) for the post of Prime minister? Does it matter that as Prime minister of India Manmohan Singh only looks after the affairs of the government while political matters are looked after by the Congress party president, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi?

Interestingly Pakistan, which can hardly be called a democracy, and is run by Army Chief General Pervaiz Musharraf, also nominated a new Prime minister recently, a banker/ technocrat Shaukat Aziz who, like Rajya Sabha (India's upper house) member Dr. Manmohan Singh, was a member of Pakistan's Upper house, the Pakistani Senate. But, unlike the Sonia Gandhi 'nominated' Indian prime minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, (who has, to India's eternal shame, indicated no intention of resigning from the Rajya Sabha and standing up for election for a seat in the Indian parliament, Lok Sabha, as he obviously thinks that the lady-who-could-have-been-PM Mrs. Sonia Gandhi's likes and dislikes are above the law in present-day India) Pakistani prime minster Shaukat Aziz, after resigning from the Senate, has successfully sought and won an election for a seat in his country's parliament from not one, but two, constituencies, before being sworn in as head of government. Even Pakistan's shaky 'democracy' seems to have leapt ahead of the Indian democracy, nay Castocracy, which has been misruled by the heriditary Pandit Nehru dynasty for more than forty years, since independence in 1947, when Imperial Britain withdrew in haste from the subcontinent.

Even if one were to ignore the relevant questions asked by Yashwant Sinha about the current state of the Indian 'democracy' the question that comes to mind is whether India provides equality to equals and unequals as suggested by Plato in his defining comment in the REPUBLIC? Do the rights, privileges, ranks, opportunities, wealth and power of the thirty million upper caste Brahmins in India equal the rights, privileges, ranks, opportunities, wealth and power available to the over two hundred million 'unequal' outcaste Untouchables, (> http://magma.nationalgeographicm/ngm/0306/feature1/index.html <) or to the five hundred million unequal lower Shudra castes or the 120 million persecuted Muslims in the Indian social/economic order? They don't! The jingoists in India should ask themselves as to how does the Indian 'democracy' measure along side the British and Swedish democracies for example or the American democracy whose cardinal principle is the July 04, 1776, Declaration of American Independence drafted by Thomas Jefferson which reads, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that thy are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty anf the pursuit of happiness."

Shikhandi, the derogatory name bestowed, on Dr. Manmohan Singh, by Mr. Yashwant Sinha, (for the benefit of readers who may not know, is a character from the Hindu epic, Mahaabharata) was a eunuch and was the brother of Daropadi, who was the common wife of the five Pandva brothers, Yudhishtra, Bhim, Arjun, Nakul and Sahdev. Shikhandi is also known by the female/male name of Ambha/Shikhandi. One of the Pandva brothers, Arjun the crafty warrior is supposed to have used Shikhandi as a shield to fire his fatal arrow at his enemy Bhisham Pitama who as a warrior had announced earlier that he would not attack a eunuch or a woman.

Yashwant Sinha's above mentioned broadside is timely as it focuses attention on the fraud that is India - 'election by the incompetent many for the pleasure and loot of the corrupt few'. Does India come anywhere near the defination of democracy by that great 5th century B.C. historian and philosopher Thucydides who wrote in the Peloponnesian War that, "We are called a democracy, for the administration is in the hands of the many and not of the few". As everybody ought to be aware, that the world's largest Castocracy, India, has one of the world's longest surviving forms of social and economic stratification, the caste system, which has been embedded in South Asian Hindu culture for thousands of years. It follows a basic precept of Vedic society that, ALL MEN ARE CREATED UNEQUAL (unlike the American concept that ALL men are born EQUAL) and has resulted in the division of India's current Hindu population (which makes up about 82% of the over one billion total) into four varnas (colors or major divisions or castes or Zaats or jatis) which are:- Brahmins-about 3%; Kashatriyas (the Warrior caste); Vashiyas (the traders caste), Shudras (the lowest caste) and the outcasts called the Untouchables or achuts. This fifth group, is considered too impure, too polluted to rank as worthy beings and its members are shunned and insulted, banned from temples and higher caste homes and it is not uncommon for them to be raped, beaten, humiliated, burned, lynched and murdered for no apparent reason. For a backgrounder read the column dated September 10, 2003, headlined, "How can India be a Democracy when it follows the basic precept that ALL men are created UNEQUAL?" by clicking at the following link: > http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/Main/K_Calling/kc09102003.htm < and the column dated August 13, 2003, headlined, "India's Democracy? By the Brahmin. Of the Brahmin. For the Brahmin & the Cow": > http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/Main/K_Calling/kc08132003.htm <

This ancient belief system, that created India's lower castes, Untouchables and their never-ending misery, has overpowered most modern Laws, drafted and promulgated, by the Indian parliament like the Indian Constitution which forbids caste discrimination and is supposed to have abolished Untouchability. Some supposition! The Rig Vedas and the Instruction Manual of the Hindu Caste System - the racist Laws of Manu, drafted about 2,500 years ago - prescribe for each caste whom to marry, what to eat, how to earn money, whom to fight, how to keep clean, and whom to avoid etc., etc. Castes are the building blocks of Hindu society. Membership of a caste is by birth: one may lose one's caste identity by being thrown out of one's caste for severe misconduct but one does not become a member of another caste. Castes reproduce themselves through endogamy ie., marriage within a defined group. Caste occupations are usually hereditary particularly among artisan and 'service' castes. Each caste and subcaste (there may be over 3, 000) stands below, above or on a par with others in a system of strict social ranking.

Obviously the socalled Indian democracy is a total farce. Here is an example of that farce.The current month of November 2004, marks the twentieth anniversary of the 1984 anti/Sikh pogroms ordered by the then Prime minister of India, Rajiv Gandh, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi's husband, in which nearly ten thousand innocent Sikh men, women and children were put to death by Hindu mobs (organized and led by the police and ruling Congress party officials) in a three day spree of mass murder in Indian urban centers including New Delhi. In the twenty years since then no one has been found guilty of that crime just as no one has been found guilty for the 2002 state-sponsored anti-Muslim Gujarat pogrom. For details of that mass murder of the Sikhs in India read our column dated November 03, 2004 headlined, "Human Rights Watch & Amnesty International condemn India on 20th anniversay of 1984 mass killings of Sikh minority," by clicking at: > http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/Main/K_Calling/kc11032004.htm <

India's socalled democracy reminds one of the profound statement made by the 32nd President of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1882-1945), in a June 1938 letter to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, that, "No democracy can long survive which does not accept as fundamental to its very existence the recognition of the rights of minorities." In polytheistic India the unhappy beleaguered monotheistic Christian, Sikh and Muslim minorities (over one hundred and sixty million souls) 'have no rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.' They all live in fear of losing their very existance - their life and property. The chance of misruled fascist India surviving in its present farcical democractic form as a united nation, (which geographical hallucination Sir Winston Churchill used to describe as, 'a geographical term'. India is no more a united nation than the Equator,' he would often say) is next to nil. Is it any wonder that the Sikhs (22 million captive in India and three million free and prosperous in the diaspora) having experienced, for over half a century, the misrule and tyranny of the Dynastic Brahmin-caste-dominated Indian 'democracy', want an egalitarian, democratic buffer state of Khalistan? The Sikh-majority state of Khalistan, will stretch from the Jumna River on the East to the Pakistan border on the West, Kashmir on the North and China on the North East and will act as a bridge of peace and commerce between South Asia and the oil/gas of the seven Stans of Central Asia.

India is NOT a democracy, it is a fascist DemoNcracy!

Khalistan Zindabad :: Long Live Khalistan

 

Khalistan Mission statement

The three million strong diaspora Sikhs, unlike their 22 million compatriots captive in India, are free and prosperous and they are determined - as they believe it is their destiny and pray for it every day; "Raj Karayga Khalsa; (Sikhs will rule) Aaaqi Rahaya nah Koyay: Khawar hoiyey Sab Milaingay; Bachay Sharan Joh Hoyay; DILLI Takht Par Bahay Gee; Aap Guru Kee Fauj; Chattar Chulayn gay Sis Par; Barri Karaygee Mauj," - to create a sovereign, democratic, egalitarian Sikh buffer state of KHALISTAN in South Asia, stretching from the Jumna river on the East, to the Pakistan border on the West, China on the Northeast and Kashmir on the North, playing its God-given role of a granary for countries of Central Asia and acting as a 'bridge of prosperity' and commerce between Central and South Asia.

* Please E-mail or FAX newsletter

to a friend, opinion maker, Congressman, Think Tank & / or newspapers in your area

---------------

Khalistan Calling weekly newsletter dated November 10, 2004

(and its archives) can be viewed on the South Asia Tribune site at:

> http://www.satribune.com >

by clicking on the 'SIKH CORNER" on the Front Page.

It can also be seen by clicking at: > http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/Main/K_Calling/kc11102004.htm <.

The above newsletter has been published in the leading Punjabi-English newspaper of the Sikh diaspora, Surrey-Canada-based CHARHDI KALA, Issue of November 10-16, 2004 :: Vol. 20 : No.45 Last week's Khalistan Calling is available on the Khalistan Affairs Centre website at: (> http://www.khalistan-affairs.org/Main/K_Calling/kc11032004.htm <) This Khalistan Calling newsletter was also published, in the second week of November, 2004, in the Vancouver-based PUNJAB GUARDIAN, and AKAL GUARDIAN, Toronto-based SANJH SAVERA, Calgary-based SIKH VIRSA and numerous other Punjabi/English weekly and monthly publications which cater to the three million strong Sikh diaspora in Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia.

Thank you for browsing

> www.khalistan-affairs.org <

is the Internet site of

Khalistan Affairs Center

956-National Press Building, Washington DC 20045 USA

Tel: 202-637-9210 :: Fax: 202-637-9211

Permission to quote or reprint material from this site

is granted in advance as long as you make the proper acknowledgment.

* Please feel free to E-mail

to a friend, Think-Tank, Library, opinion-maker, Law-maker

& or local newspaper/Magazine.

=====THE END=====